Justice for Medicine

CPSO v. Trozzi – Case Update – November 1, 2023


We are the Administrative State and You are Not

The Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal has ruled that Dr. Mark Trozzi is guilty of professional misconduct and dishonourable conduct and is incompetent in the practice medicine for questioning the government’s Covid-19 narrative. He was also found guilty of professional misconduct and was deemed incompetent for writing medical exemptions for Covid-19 injections in support of a patient’s right to refuse coerced medical treatment under Ontario’s Health Care Consent Act and section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

In 2021, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario established three Covid-19 restrictions through website statements — doctors were forbidden from: (i) making any statements that discourage anyone from following Covid-19 public policies and recommendations; (ii) prescribing alternative Health Canada approved medications for the treatment of Covid-19; and (iii) writing medical exemptions for Covid-19 injections, unless a patient had suffered a severe allergic reaction or developed myocarditis after a first shot. Based on the restrictions relating to freedom of expression and medical exemptions, the College issued investigation orders against Dr. Trozzi in 2021.

This eventually led to a five-day hearing in July of 2023 during which the College Tribunal focused its prosecution on Dr. Trozzi’s daily newsletter at drtrozzi.org, where he had supposedly caused harm by spreading “misinformation” about Covid-19 science. The College was particularly concerned with Dr. Trozzi’s view that neither Big Pharma nor Health Canada had done the due diligence required to prove the Covid-19 injections were safe and effective. The Tribunal concluded that his views were inflammatory, unprofessional and worthy of censure. On November 10th, the Tribunal will hold a penalty hearing to determine whether to revoke the licence of the 25-year ER veteran and former university professor.

Trozzi’s lawyer, Michael Alexander, commented: “The Tribunal wrote up the prosecution’s position on almost every issue. The one saving grace was the College’s acknowledgement that the right to free expression includes the right to make statements that may be wrong or mistaken. However, that position is difficult to reconcile with the Tribunal’s view that Dr. Trozzi can be punished for spreading misinformation.

He added: “The Tribunal did not address our argument that the College lacked the authority to investigate and prosecute Dr. Trozzi since its Covid-19 restrictions were merely recommendations rather than binding rules or regulations, even though we cited the Ontario Divisional Court and the Ontario Court of Appeal in support of our position.”

Further, he stated: “The Tribunal totally ignored our cross-examination of the College’s expert witnesses, which makes the entire decision a complete travesty. On cross, the College’s main expert witness on Covid science, Dr. Andrew Gardam, admitted that he had never responded to the 41-page expert report provided by Dr. Trozzi in which he rebutted Gardam’s own 8-page expert report with 29 scientific citations. As a result, in closing submissions, we argued that Dr. Trozzi was unrefuted on Covid science; yet, the Tribunal made no mention of this fact.”

Finally, he added: “The Tribunal also paid no attention to the fact that the Supreme Court recognized an expansive right to freedom of expression as an inherent feature of parliamentary government as early as 1939, which gives the right a higher status than it enjoys under the Charter. In matters of law, we will appeal the decision to the Divisional Court on the standard of correctness.”

For media inquiries, please contact Michael Alexander by cell at 416-318-4512 and by e-mail at malexanderjd@protonmail.com.

5 responses

  1. Save the Doctors!! Save the patient’s!!! Tell the truth!!! Hell is very real just look around you!! Save yourself!! Amen

  2. It is time that the CPSO. dismiss these charges against Dr. Mark Trozzi regarding restrictions placed on him and other doctors who did not follow the administrative executive protocol. When did the CPSO think it was okay to lie to the public regarding informed consent. And, that it was okay not only to put a patient in harms way, but to breach confidential information between the doctor and their patient. There have been countless lies and misinformation made to the public on these experimental drugs as well as pertinent information being withheld. Lets start with the predators. Health Canada. PHAC. CPSO. media and all levels of government pertaining to the questionable pandemic.
    These injections did not prevent you from getting infected. They did prevent you from infecting others. They did not prevent you from going to the hospital nor dying. Do you think that other alternatives of treatment should have been allowed. I can only guess that it is more about the money.
    Our health care system is broken and is in need of a dire overhaul. How anyone can trust the medical community again is beyond many peoples comprehension. Drop charges against Dr Trozzi and all other health care providers. And, start making amends to the Public that has darkened our trust.

  3. It is called a ‘hearing’, but why isn’t it called what it really is? A joke? A kangaroo court? Bullying? A foregone conclusion? Has any doctor speaking against the deep pockets of pharmaceutically driven medicine ever won a ‘hearing’ ? If you do a search for Dr Donald Branigan of White Horse, or Dr Pieter Taams of BC, or Dr Owen Schwartz of Manitoba?, what justice was there for these pioneer physicians? There are many more. They too faced a ‘Board’ of physicians who had no sympathy whatsoever for a non-pharmaceutical point of view. Why don’t the people who prefer a nutritional or non-drug approach to health care have the same rights and privileges as those that prefer drug therapy? Why is there this discrimination and obvious bullying in Medicine against other points of view. Has anyone done a search into the influence – the money paid to physicians as bonus’s from pharma – and how that affects the outcome? Oh ya! How about a former Minister of Health Rafe Mair – he did. Wrote a book called ‘Squandering Billions’ with Dr Don Nixdorf. And the wagons circled, and they understood first-hand how pharma did it. Maybe some day there will be a legitimate ‘hearing’ where the ‘Board’ is chosen for it’s common sense and independence from vested interests. Just saying…

  4. Dr. Trozzi tells the TRUTH!!! It is time that the CPSO. dismiss these charges against Dr. Mark Trozzi regarding restrictions placed on him and other doctors who did not follow the administrative executive protocol. When did the CPSO think it was okay to lie to the public regarding informed consent. You are all just mouth pieces for big pharma!

  5. the college of physicians is guilty of crimes against humanity and will not admit their guilt
    this is why they must all hang for treason and murder

    this also includes Bonnie Henry and the BC college of physicians
    as well as Ontario

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Donate by Mail:

To make an offline donation toward this cause, follow these steps:

  1. Write a cheque payable to “Justice for Medicine Inc.”
  2. On the memo line of the cheque, indicate that the donation is for “Justice for Medicine”
  3. Mail your cheque to:

155 Dalhousie St, Suite 410
Toronto, ON M5B 2P7